Explanation
of Arson or Accidental Fire
Written
Assignment #6: Arson or Not?
Leslie
K. Penny
Chancellor
University
Abstract
The following essay
depicts four particular scenarios providing limited details of a fire either in
a building or residential home. The
writer must decipher whether each scenario is caused by arson or by accidental or
natural causes using limited information obtained from the learning materials
provided. This writer believes two out
the four scenarios were caused by arson going off the information provided in
the scenario.
Written
Assignment #5: Explanation of Arson or Accidental Fire
The following essay explains whether certain scenarios
were caused by arson or by accidental means according to information gleaned
from the learning materials of the week.
Arson, meaning the fire was set on purpose for reasons such as a
malicious act, revenge, for monetary gain or to cover up another crime. While an accidental fire can range from heat
sources such as heating or cooking systems, electrical systems, smoking or
human negligence to natural heat sources such as spontaneous combustion and
lightening (Osterburg & Ward, 2004, pgs 4932-493). This writer will give an explanation of each
scenario listed below as to the cause of the fire.
Scenario 1: Investigators at a residential fire find much
of the roof destroyed and the floor in
the living room seriously damaged.
However, there is little fire damage to the floors and the walls of the rooms not adjacent to the
living room.
The scenario depicts that there is no evidence of
"streamers", meaning there were no separate and unconnected fires to
spread the fire from one room to another by the use of gasoline, paper or other
burnable sources (Saferstein, 2007, p. 319).
However this doesn't necessarily mean arson wasn't involved. Considering the scenario doesn't state
weather the walls were damaged at all in the one burned room, there is no
V-shaped pattern that would help with the location of the origin of the fire.
This writer believes this is an accidental or natural
caused fire, not arson. The roof is
completely burned indicating that could be the source of origin and the
seriously damaged floor could be caused by burning debris from the ceiling and
roof falling into the room. Natural
reasons for the roof catching fire would include lightening. It is also well known that heat rises. If oily rags were stored in a poorly
ventilated container in the attic (if this house has one) then the possibility,
small as it may be, for spontaneous combustion has to be considered
(Saferstein, 2007, p 317). Other causes
could include an electrical fire from a fixture on the ceiling of the room in
question or an electrical issue in the attic, among other guesses.
Scenario 2: A large, multistory warehouse, bordered on
the North and South sides by residential
areas, burns to the ground earlier in the evening. Residents of both report seeing small fires burning on the ground floor
earlier in the evening.
There have been many cases where warehouses, especially
abandoned ones, have burned down caused by the negligence of transients making
small fires to keep warm. However, due
to the close proximity of residential areas it's doubtful transients are
holding up in the warehouse, but this is no guarantee that that is indeed the
case. There is no evidence mentioned in
the scenario that this particular warehouse is abandoned.
This writer believes this scenario is arson based. Residents on both ends of the building saw
several small fires which could indicate the use of streamers so the fire would
spread throughout the warehouse or that there were more than one delinquent
setting fires in different locations of the building. Upon further investigation after the rubble
is removed, irregularly shaped patterns on the ground would further indicate
the use of accelerants on the floor adding to the arson conclusion.
Scenario 3: The fire in the three-room office is
extinguished before a great deal of damage
is done. The floors of each room are
charred, but there is little damage to the ceiling.
This writer believes this is a case of arson mainly from
the fact that the floor of each room was burned possibly due to streamer fires where
a separate fire is set in each room spreading a "trail of gasoline or
paper to cause the fire to move rapidly from one room to the next"
(Saferstein, 2007, p319). The fact that
the ceiling in each room sustained little damage could also indicate a fast
burning accelerant was used that burned off quickly. Also the swift efforts of whomever
extinguished the fire prevented the ceiling from suffering major damage.
Scenario 4: Most of the damage from a home fire is
confined to two adjacent walls. Neighbors on both sides report that
the lights in the house went out shortly before the fire started.
It is doubtful an arsonist would have lights on in the
house as they went about their fire starting tasks. However, if a homeowner were committing arson
in their home for personal gain or to cover up a crime they probably wouldn't
turn the lights off thinking keeping them on would take suspicion off of
them. And its normal to turn the lights
off as you make your way out of the home.
However, this writer believes this was an accidental burning. Considering the walls that were burned gives
the indication that possibly a cigarette could be to blame or even an
electrical fire involving a lamp sitting on a table in the corner of the
adjacent walls.
To conclude, each fire related incident is a mystery
until a full investigation is conducted
using the evidence found at the scene, witness statements, and an investigation
into the owner(s) to rule them out as suspects.
Deciphering the above scenarios provides an insight into the world of
arson or accidental fires giving the writer the opportunity to use judgment,
imagination and information gleaned from learning materials to provide an
assessment of the fire.
Reference
Saferstein, R. (2007). Criminalistics: An introduction to forensic
science (9th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson
Prentice Hall.
Ward, H. Richard, Osterburg, W. James: Criminal
Investigation: A Method for Reconstructing the Past
(4th ed.). Cincinnatie: Anderson Publishing.
No comments:
Post a Comment