Sunday, November 2, 2014

School Essay: Drug Control Laws



Written Assignment #5: Drug Control Laws
Leslie K. Penny
Chancellor University








Abstract
There have been many laws implemented by congress over the years to better the fight against the war on drugs.  With the insistence of President Nixon, congress combined the drug regulation bureaus into one called the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, which encompasses Title II, the Controlled Substance Act of 1970.  The Controlled Substance Act encompasses five schedules of classification for controlled substances on the basis of the drug's potential for abuse, potential for physical and psychological dependency, and its medical value.  The five schedules include the penalties incurred as well as a ranking of the violations.  The act also regulates the manufacture, importation, possession and distribution of certain drugs.  CSA has been altered to suit the war on drugs since its inception in 1970 which benefits the ones that serve in the fight.      









Written Assignment #4: Drug Control Laws
             There came a point in time, to be specific, the late 1960's, when congresses advancement to the nation's drug problem wasn't enough for those in our society who wanted stricter laws and a more powerful government to implement them.  Therefore, in 1968, President Johnson  requested that congress come up with something better.  Congress did away with the Federal Bureau of Narcotics and the Bureau of Drug Abuse Control making way for a new program called the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs.  But with the new program as well as other federal agencies that were somewhat involved in drug regulation became too confusing, so, two years later, by request of the next president in line, President Nixon, congress combined all the regulations into a single statute called the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, which encompasses Title II, the Controlled Substance Act of 1970, (http://www.answers.com/topic/controlled-substances-act-1970).
            The purpose of the Controlled Substance Act is to "regulate the manufacture, importation, possession, and distribution of certain drugs," (http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Controlled-Substances-Act&id=1229824) which has "five schedules of classification for controlled dangerous substances on the basis of a drug's potential for abuse, potential for physical and psychological dependence, and medical value," (Saferstein, 2007, p. 265).  Each of the five schedules include the penalties incurred as well as a ranking of the violations.  The substances were ranked "by balancing potential for abuse against medical usefulness," (http://www.answers.com/topic/controlled-substances-act-1970). 
            According to our reading material, Schedule 1drugs are those that have an elevated potential for abuse and are currently not used in the United States for any medical reasons nor as a safe medical treatment.  Drugs included in this schedule are heroin, marijuana, methaqualone,  LSD and according to http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Controlled-Substances-Act&id=1229824, also include GHB, MDMA, psilocybin, peyote and mescaline.  Schedule one drugs have a manufacturing quota set by the attorney general and the criminal penalty is a "first offense punishable by up to 20 years in prison and/or up to a $1 million dollar fine for an individual or up to $5 million for other than individual," (Saferstein, 2007, p 265-266). 
            Schedule II drugs also have a high potential for abuse but are accepted for medical use with severe restrictions with the potential for severe psychological or physical dependency.  Drugs included in schedule II are opium and its derivatives not listed in schedule I, cocaine, methadone, phencyclidine (PCP), most amphetamine preparations, and most barbiturate preparations containing amobarbital, secobabital, and pentobarbital.  Dronabinol is also included in schedule II, which is the synthetic equivalent of the active ingredient in marijuana, for its growing medical uses in the treatment of glaucoma and chemotherapy patients (Saferstein, 2007, p. 266).  The book states schedule II drugs are also a first defense like schedule I and the penalty is the same, up to 20 years in prison and/or up to $1 million for an individual or up to $5 million for other than an individual. 
            Schedule III drugs have a less likely potential for abuse than the ones in schedule I and II.  They are accepted for medical use in the United States and have a low or moderate physical dependency or a high psychological dependency.  Substances covered under schedule three include "Ketamine, anabolic steroids, codeine (http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Controlled-Substances-Act&id=1229824), and all barbiturate preparations, except Phenobarbital.  The penalty for schedule III drugs is 0-5 years in prison and/or up to a $250,000 fine (Saferstein, 2007, p. 267).
            Schedule IV drugs, in comparison with schedule III drugs, have a lower potential for abuse and are also used in the United States for medical purposes.  Abuse of these drugs could lead to a limited dependency compared to those in schedule III.  Drugs in this schedule include propoxyphene (Darvon); phenobarbital; and tranquilizers such as meprobamate (Miltown), diazepam (Valium), and chlordiazepoxide (Librium).  The penalty for these drugs is 0-3 in prison and/or a $250,000 fine (Saferstein, 2007, p. 267).
            Lastly is Schedule V.  These drugs must show that they have a low abuse potential, are medically used in the Unites States and have a lower dependency potential then schedule IV drugs.  Drugs under this schedule include certain opiate drug mixtures that contain non-narcotic medicinal ingredients.  The penalty for these drugs is 0-3 years in prison and/or a $100,000 fine (Saferstein, 2007, p. 267). 
            The CSA also goes into detail on its policy for designer drugs which are "substances that are chemically related to some controlled drugs and are pharmacologically very potent" (Saferstein, 2007, p. 267).  These drugs receive the same penalty as schedule I drugs to help combat their prevalence in the United States.  These substances are made by much skilled individuals in secret labs who believe their drug will not be covered by the schedules listed above.  These types of drugs have killed numerous people due to overdose but as they become known they are placed in the appropriate schedule (Saferstein, 2007, p. 268). 
            To conclude, this writer believes the Controlled Substance Act accomplished as much of its purpose as humanely possible.  The schedule system provides categories for the legal community to use in their continuing diligence to prevent and control the abuse of drugs.  It provides a penalty system for the courts to use.  Regulating the manufacture of drugs is a bit more difficult, except in the pharmaceutical community, due to the fact that criminal labs are in abundance but it is assumed it is being regulated with diligence.  Laws were set up in accordance with the CSA concerning importation.  It's naive to assume that all drugs that are being imported in the Unites States are found but the system eliminates the problem as much as possible.  And, of course, possession and distribution is an ongoing fight that has no end in sight.  The penalties that are in place are there to deter criminals but that is never a guarantee the criminal will adhere to the laws after the fact.
           
           

           








Reference

 Saferstein, R. (2007). Criminalistics: An introduction to forensic science (9th ed.). New Jersey:                Pearson Prentice Hall.
Devine, J. (n.d.). ezinearticles. Retrieved 06 08, 2012, from The Controlled Substances Act:             http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Controlled-Substances-Act&id=1229824
Gale's Major Acts of Congress. (2004). Retrieved 06 09, 2012, from Major Acts of Congress:             http://www.answers.com/topic/controlled-substances-act-1970

No comments:

Post a Comment