Discovery
Process in the State of New York
Leslie
K. Penny
Module
5-Research Assignment 4
Chancellor
University
Abstract Discovery Process in the State of New York
The discovery process is an important part of a case
because it provides the opportunity for both parties to discover what each
sides view points of the case are (The Discovery Process, 2010). This essay will concentrate on those
particular steps involved in New York's discovery process which include
depositions, interrogatories, requests for production, subpoenas, admissions
and motions to compel disclosure and sanctions (A Jailhouse Lawyer's Manual, 2009) . Items that are required to be turned over to
the prosecutor will be discussed as well as where the discovery system or
procedure is codified and what type of evidence that does not need to be turned
over to the defense. Open discovery will
be explained as well as what penalties can occur if discovery is not done
properly and timely.
In the discovery of documents, all documents must be
disclosed to the other parties in the proceeding "that could be used by
any party at trial to prove or disprove a material fact" (The Discovery Process, 2010). Meaning that all documents must be described
and be made available to the other party to observe. The examination for discovery is when one party
asks the opposing party a sequence of questions during a meeting where
interrogatories are "a series or written questions provided to the other
party to be answered in writing" which may only be used with the court's
permission (The Discovery Process, 2010). The pre-trial examination of witnesses is a
process that can be used if a person has material evidence that relates to the
case and not a party to the action in question and that, too, can only used
with permission of the court (The Discovery Process, 2010). Lastly, are notices to admit which allow one
to ask the other party to disclose the truth of particular facts in question (The Discovery Process, 2010).
In the state of New York, the criminal discovery process
is actually referred to as "disclosure" instead of
"discovery" (A Jailhouse Lawyer's Manual, 2009) and is mainly
"governed by Article 240 of New York's Criminal Procedure law" (Solimeo,
2007). However, in many states, discovery is derived
from statutes and court rules "but a defendant's right to discovery can be
based on five different types of sources:1) statuses; 2) court rules; 3)
judicial power; 4) the common law; and 5) the Constitution (Solimeo,
2007). The New York Law School site goes on to say
that the rules vary widely in the scope and timing of the states, "from
the restrictive model of New York's Article 240 and Federal Rule of Criminal
Procedure 16, to the broad rules of the ABA Standard model" (Solimeo, 2007).
Of course like with any state, civil litigation works
differently than criminal cases. When it
comes to civil litigation, the rules of discovery allow each side almost free
access to all relevant information that exist from each party (Solimeo,
2007). Depositions, interrogatories, document
production, inspections and physical and mental examinations are conducted in
civil litigation's for disclosing information (The Discovery Process, 2010). However, there is a huge difference when it
comes to criminal discovery, mainly due to a defendants life being at stake,
therefore the information being shared between both sides is greatly limited (The Discovery Process, 2010).
Rules that apply to criminal discovery that govern many
aspects of the criminal just system include: "1) the rules may involve
providing notice, such as the requirement for the defense to give notice of any
alibi or insanity defense it intends to offer at trial, or the government's
duty to give notice of whether it plans to offer the defendant's confession; 2)
discovery rules govern the parties' right of access to evidence, such as the
right to inspect or copy certain physical material; 3) the rules specify the
type of information that one party must provide to the other upon request, such
as a copy of a defendant's criminal record; and 4) importantly, discovery rules
govern the timing of when information must of disclosed, such as what
information is available before the trial begins, and what is provided after
the formal proceedings are underway" (Solimeo, 2007).
As mentioned above, "parties are not required to
meet or give out information voluntarily", they must request that
information, which is completely different than federal discovery (A Jailhouse
Lawyer's Manual, 2009).
One thing to point out is that both parties do not need to wait until
after they meet before they can start making requests for information which is
generally requested after a complaint has been filed, "but only after the
defendant has responded or the time period for the defendant's response has
expired, whichever comes sooner" (A Jailhouse Lawyer's Manual,
2009).
Items that may be requested in the discovery process
between the accused and the prosecutor are limited material such as
"photographs, copy, or test certain types of 'property', like police
reports or statements" (A Jailhouse Lawyer's Manual,
2009).
Other discoverable material than may be requested includes any written,
recorded, or oral statements the defendant made to the police or to individuals
acting following police direction "other than in the course of the
criminal transaction" (A Jailhouse Lawyer's Manual, 2009). Other material includes similar statements
that were made by co-defendants if they are being tried jointly with the
defendant; conversations that are recorded; any statements made before the
criminal transaction began; transcripts of any testimony the defendant or
co-defendant made before a grand jury; scientific evidence such as written
documents relating to physical or mental examinations; scientific tests or
experiments which relate to the crime in question; psychological reports;
ballistic reports; drug tests; semen tests; blood-typing tests (A Jailhouse Lawyer's Manual, 2009).
Materials that are generally non-discoverable "under
Article 240 are (1) attorney's work product, and (2) records of any statement
made in the course of the criminal transaction, with the exception of any
electronic recordings that the prosecutor intends to introduce at trial" (A Jailhouse
Lawyer's Manual, 2009).
When speaking of an attorney's work product, it is explained in the
statute as "property to the extent that it contains the opinions,
theories, or conclusions of the prosecutor, defense counsel or members of their
legal staffs" (A Jailhouse Lawyer's Manual,
2009). Therefore, the prosecutor is not obligated to
hand over memoranda or other documents that contain the prosecutors legal
opinions or theories and vice versa for the defense if the prosecutor demands
it (A Jailhouse Lawyer's Manual,
2009).
It is the duty of the prosecution and the defendant to
disclose information properly. Both the
defendant and the prosecutor must relinquish any important information or
documents that have been requested one must not ignore the demands for
discoverable material by the prosecution (A Jailhouse Lawyer's Manual,
2009). If one does then they risk facing court
sanctions handed down by the court (A Jailhouse Lawyer's Manual,
2009). The prosecutor or defendant can refuse to
requested information when one "has a reasonable belief that the requested
material is not discoverable (irrelevant, privileged, or subject to a
protective order) (A Jailhouse Lawyer's Manual,
2009).
To conclude, there is much information to learn and steps
to perform in the discovery process. As
explained, discovery in New York has some differences than federal discovery
process, as with many states. We have
learned all the forms of discovery and how one must go about disclosing that
information. Material that must be
turned over if requested as well as the information that does not have to be
turned over to each party is explained in detail. As one is going about the discovery process,
they must be sure to do it properly or will face the consequences from the
court in the form of sanctions.
Works Cited
A Jailhouse Lawyer's Manual. (2009). Retrieved June 08, 2013, from Columbia Human
Rights Law Review: http://www3.law.columbia.edu/hrlr/jlm/Chapter_8.pdf
Solimeo, C. (2007, May
11). An Analysis of the Impact of Discovery Rules on Dispositions in
Criminal Cases. Retrieved June 08, 2013, from New York Law School Justice
Action Center:
http://www.nyls.edu/user_files/1/3/4/30/59/65/68/capstone060705.pdf
The Discovery
Process. (2010, July). Retrieved 06
08, 2013, from Justice Educatioin:
http://www.supremecourtbc.ca/sites/default/files/web/The-Discovery-Process.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment